My gut feeling is that, for the foreseeable future, reverse onus of proof legislation will never be passed jurisdictions such as BC that remain very auto-centric. That being the case, more and more cyclists are now taking advantage of helmet or bike mounted miniature video cameras to create a record of any incidents, but are these really useful? What is the legal status of these recordings, under what circumstances or restrictions would they be considered admissible or relevant?
Posted bySimonOctober 25, 2012 11:11:46
seems like...
The idea seems like it is a good one, but without any knowledge of how these laws have performed, it's hard to mount an effective opposition to the very real point that one should be presumed innocent first, rather than guilty (and liable)
Posted byBradOctober 24, 2012 05:46:21
Results
Does anyone know what the results have been in the countries that adopted reverse onus?
Has the collision rates between bicycles and motor vehicles decreased?
Sending...Oops, an error occurred, please try again later.Comment successfully submitted. All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
You need to enter the correct word from the image.Subject needed: Please enter a subject.EMail needed: Please enter an email address.You need to put in a correct email address.Name needed: Please enter a name.Comment needed: Please enter your comment.
Comments
Bike mounted cameras
Posted by Simon October 25, 2012 11:11:46
seems like...
Posted by Brad October 24, 2012 05:46:21
Results
Posted by Brad October 17, 2012 07:07:52