by David Hay

July 1, 2010

, ,

Comments

  • agreed

    It is confusing. I find the text of the article to be impenetrable due to its legalistic verbosity. Or, wtf?

    Did the cyclist err? If so, how?

    Posted by Travis August 21, 2010 23:01:50

  • Confusion

    This is so confusing. So, where are we suppose to be? Shouldn't we act act in laws of a car? The worst is that car drivers can't realized that when you have obstruction and you are uncertain of what is around you, they should slow down and be sure.

    Anyway, if the car had obstruction, the cyclist shouldn't pay for it. Cyclist have 360' view and can stop on a penny.

    I'm disappointed to read the court decision.

    Posted by Vancouver Cyclist July 18, 2010 21:37:00

Add your thoughts

  

Subscribe May/June 2012

Most Recent Comments