Momentum Magazine
Cycling advocates push back after Canadian police release victim-blaming road safety video

Cycling advocates push back after Canadian police release victim-blaming road safety video

A recent road safety video from the Richmond RCMP in British Columbia has sparked a heated reaction. The video, titled “Pedestrian Safety is a Two-Way Street,” tries to teach people about road safety. However, the vast majority of people responding to it, particularly cycling and safe roads advocates, are unhappy with it and are letting […]

Written by:

A recent road safety video from the Richmond RCMP in British Columbia has sparked a heated reaction. The video, titled “Pedestrian Safety is a Two-Way Street,” tries to teach people about road safety. However, the vast majority of people responding to it, particularly cycling and safe roads advocates, are unhappy with it and are letting the Richmond RCMP know about it.

The video shows only the driver of a car doing something illegal while the pedestrian is crossing legally at a crosswalk. This has led many to point out that the video unfairly puts some blame on pedestrians for accidents and doesn’t focus enough on the responsibilities of drivers.

So far, on the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, there are 2,600 comments and counting. Here are a few of the most popular.

The controversial video has made people think about who should be more responsible for road safety and also about the nature of victim blaming. And how governments continue the mantra of shared responsibility that only seems to reinforce the status quo. Until we acknowledge that this is entirely not a two-way street and that roads and public space have always been and continue to be heavily weighted in favour of cars and car drivers, vulnerable road users including cyclists and pedestrians will not be safe enough. Prioritise people.

A day after the video was released a driver of a vehicle hit and killed a pedestrian on Granville Avenue in Richmond.

1 Comment

  • Ted Marz

    It isn’t exactly victim blaming. In the pedestrian case is it guidance (mostly not bad, some a little OTT) as to how to make it less likely to be involved in an accident. Involve, not cause. Most of this is about not cutting off situational awareness and defensive things to be more conspicuous.

    In the driver case, it is about causing an accident.

Comments are closed.

Autumn Gear Guide

Find inspiration in our Gear Guide that will keep you out on your bike through wind or rain.

Download Now

Signup to Weekly Newsletter